Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
12
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
6P test report[2016/09/11]
-
Rigid Transparent Plastics: Global Markets Outside North America[2016/10/14]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Batterty Energy Tech In Paradise [2016/11/18]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
Apple's iPhone 7 Lands in Last Place in Battery Life Test[2016/10/04]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
Comparative Analysis: The cost of new power generation in South Africa[2016/10/22]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]